<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apples &amp; Oranges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://meetingthesinlaws.com/2009/09/apples-oranges/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://meetingthesinlaws.com/2009/09/apples-oranges</link>
	<description>Musings on laws affecting adult entertainment, alcoholic beverages and other &#34;vice&#34; industries</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 16:09:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Seventh Circuit hears Annex Books (again) &#8211; Meeting the Sin Laws</title>
		<link>http://meetingthesinlaws.com/2009/09/apples-oranges/comment-page-1#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>The Seventh Circuit hears Annex Books (again) &#8211; Meeting the Sin Laws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meetingthesinlaws.com/?p=437#comment-291</guid>
		<description>[...] Circuit Court of Appeals entertained argument in Annex Books, Inc. v. City of Indianapolis. (I&#8217;ve mentioned the case before.) The City appealed from an order granting a preliminary injunction to the bookstores. The panel, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Circuit Court of Appeals entertained argument in Annex Books, Inc. v. City of Indianapolis. (I&#8217;ve mentioned the case before.) The City appealed from an order granting a preliminary injunction to the bookstores. The panel, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preliminary injunction granted to Annex Books and company &#8211; Meeting the Sin Laws</title>
		<link>http://meetingthesinlaws.com/2009/09/apples-oranges/comment-page-1#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Preliminary injunction granted to Annex Books and company &#8211; Meeting the Sin Laws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 16:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meetingthesinlaws.com/?p=437#comment-137</guid>
		<description>[...] her cue from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, in an order issued last week, Judge Sarah Evans Barker writes: [I]n order to satisfy the burden [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] her cue from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, in an order issued last week, Judge Sarah Evans Barker writes: [I]n order to satisfy the burden [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indianapolis Adult Entertainment Ordinance Struck Down &#8211; Annex Books v. City of Indianapolis &#171; The Legal Satyricon</title>
		<link>http://meetingthesinlaws.com/2009/09/apples-oranges/comment-page-1#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Indianapolis Adult Entertainment Ordinance Struck Down &#8211; Annex Books v. City of Indianapolis &#171; The Legal Satyricon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 17:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meetingthesinlaws.com/?p=437#comment-108</guid>
		<description>[...] Tip to Cary Wiggins. And a big should out to Michael Murray, Esq. who argued the case for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tip to Cary Wiggins. And a big should out to Michael Murray, Esq. who argued the case for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

