Comments for Meeting the Sin Laws

Comment on “Son, kick their butt.” by jdu

jdu — Sun, 05 Jun 2011 16:09:01 +0000

son kick my butt

Comment on Preliminary injunction granted to Annex Books and company by The Seventh Circuit hears Annex Books (again)

The Seventh Circuit hears Annex Books (again) — Sun, 15 May 2011 21:07:19 +0000

[...] Inc. v. City of Indianapolis. (I’ve mentioned the case before.) The City appealed from an order granting a preliminary injunction to the bookstores. The panel, which included Chief Judge Easterbrook and Judge Rovner, did not tip its hand. But I [...]

Comment on Showdown in Missouri by Missouri’s adult entertainment law survives lower-court challenge – Meeting the Sin Laws

Sun, 06 Feb 2011 16:46:29 +0000

[...] As reported by AVN [adult content] here. See an ealier mention here. [...]

Comment on The Mild, Mild West by briana

briana — Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:18:07 +0000

i”m ok with xoticas but as long as it is outside city limit where no children well see the place . They should aslo do this with the drive thru thats have girls dances half naked.

Comment on Stuff by Pine Desk ·

Pine Desk · — Mon, 08 Nov 2010 10:37:36 +0000

Deal Or No Deal is one of the best shows that i always watch, i love the briefcase girls too ”

Comment on Slavery & Lawn Maintenance by Cary Wiggins

Cary Wiggins — Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:42:48 +0000

Yes indeed — you’re so right!

A few years ago, in an article I wrote for a local nightlife publication, I appropriated one of Laurence Tribe’s observations: Apart fromt the 13th Amendment, the only way a private citizen acting in a private capacity can violate the U.S. Constitution is to transport a bottle of wine into a state in violation of its alcoholic beverage laws, thus violating the 21st Amendment. If Dad violated the 13th Amendment, I’m sure that I have at some point violated the 21st Amendment.

You can link to that article: http://www.thehudspethreport.com/columnist.2.htm

Comment on Slavery & Lawn Maintenance by casual reader

casual reader — Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:08:44 +0000

The 13th Amendment doesn’t require a “state actor.” So, if your Dad TRULY forced you to mow the lawn…and that constituted “slavery” or “involuntary servitude”…your Dad indeed would have been violating the constitution.

Comment on The Hubbub with StubHub! by Steve Combs

Steve Combs — Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:26:28 +0000

My favorite line:

“The title of the Internet Tax Freedom Act is more promising. As with most statutes, however, the details are more complex than the title portends.”

Story of my life.

Comment on Stuff by Isabelle White

Isabelle White — Fri, 01 Oct 2010 10:20:36 +0000

“deal or no deal” was one of the biggest game show ever on TV`.`

Comment on Apples & Oranges by The Seventh Circuit hears Annex Books (again) – Meeting the Sin Laws

The Seventh Circuit hears Annex Books (again) – Meeting the Sin Laws — Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:18:47 +0000

[...] Circuit Court of Appeals entertained argument in Annex Books, Inc. v. City of Indianapolis. (I’ve mentioned the case before.) The City appealed from an order granting a preliminary injunction to the bookstores. The panel, [...]